|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily just received a notice—her mother’s probate case, already six months in, has been continued another 90 days. She’s furious. Not only is it delaying access to funds she desperately needs for her own family, but the legal fees are mounting rapidly. This is a common scenario, and unfortunately, continuances are a frequent source of frustration in probate and trust litigation. As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Moreno Valley, I’ve seen countless cases delayed for a variety of reasons, and understanding those reasons can at least offer some peace of mind – and help you prepare.
What Causes Probate Hearings to Be Continued?
There’s rarely a single, simple answer. Continuances aren’t usually personal attacks; they’re often a product of the court’s calendar, opposing counsel’s needs, or unforeseen complexities in the case. Here are some of the most frequent culprits.
- Overcrowded Court Calendar: This is the most common reason. Probate courts, like all courts, are often swamped with cases. Judges simply can’t get to every matter on the originally scheduled date.
- Attorney Unavailability: Counsel for any party – the executor, an heir, or a creditor – may request a continuance due to a scheduling conflict, illness, or another unavoidable commitment. Courts generally grant these requests if they’re made in good faith.
- Discovery Disputes: If parties disagree about what documents or information should be produced during discovery, it can lead to motion practice and delays. Resolving these disputes often requires court intervention, pushing back the hearing date.
- Settlement Negotiations: When parties are actively negotiating a settlement, they may request a continuance to allow more time to reach an agreement. The court usually favors encouraging settlement.
- Unexpected Issues with Assets: Problems with asset valuation, like a dispute over the appraisal of real estate or a business, can necessitate a continuance.
What if the Continuance is Unfairly Granted to the Other Side?
It’s natural to feel frustrated if you believe the continuance was granted unfairly. While you can’t directly control the court’s decision, you do have options.
First, review the notice of continuance carefully. It should state the reason for the delay. If you believe the reason is insufficient or that the opposing party is intentionally stalling, you can file a “Motion to Strike the Continuance” with the court. This motion requires you to explain why the continuance is prejudicial to you and why it shouldn’t have been granted. Be prepared to demonstrate how the delay is causing you harm – financial hardship, emotional distress, or the loss of an opportunity.
It’s also critical to document everything. Keep records of all communications with the court and opposing counsel, as well as any expenses you incur due to the delay. This documentation will be invaluable if you need to present your case to the judge.
How Can My CPA Background Help in These Situations?
My unique background as both an estate planning attorney and a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) provides a significant advantage in these complex situations. A probate case isn’t just about legal procedure; it’s fundamentally about asset valuation and tax implications. As a CPA, I’m adept at quickly identifying potential issues with asset appraisals, ensuring the correct step-up in basis is applied (which minimizes capital gains taxes for heirs), and navigating complex valuation scenarios for businesses or real estate.
For example, if a continuance is due to a dispute over the value of a family business, my CPA expertise allows me to analyze the financials, understand the valuation methods, and potentially negotiate a resolution that satisfies all parties – avoiding further delays. Simply put, I see beyond the legal arguments to the underlying financial realities.
What About Executor Fees and the Length of Probate?
The longer a probate case drags on, the higher the fees become. Remember, California law sets a mandatory Statutory Fee Schedule based on the gross value of the estate (not the net equity). For example, the fee is 4% of the first $100k, 3% of the next $100k, and 2% of the next $800k. This is a right, not a salary, and is taxable income. It’s crucial to understand these fees accumulate with each passing month.
And let’s be realistic: a probate case cannot be closed in less than roughly 7 to 9 months due to mandatory notice periods (15 days for initial hearing + 4 months for creditors), but most California probates in 2026 take 12 to 18 months due to court congestion. Minimizing delays through proactive legal strategies and efficient case management is therefore paramount.
Ultimately, a continuance is a setback, but it doesn’t have to derail the entire process. By understanding the reasons for the delay, knowing your rights, and working with an experienced attorney – one who also understands the financial implications – you can navigate these challenges and ensure a just outcome.
What causes California probate cases to spiral into delay, disputes, and extra cost?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
To manage the estate’s value, separate property types by learning what counts as a probate asset, confirm exclusions through assets that bypass probate, and support valuation steps with probate inventory requirements to reduce disagreements about what is in the estate.
A stable probate administration outcome usually follows from clarity, consistency, and readiness for court review, especially when multiple stakeholders and competing interpretations are involved. When documentation supports enforcement and timelines are respected, families are less likely to face preventable escalation.
Verified Authority on California Probate Administration
-
Executor Powers (The IAEA): California Probate Code § 10400 (Independent Administration)
The Independent Administration of Estates Act (IAEA) is the engine of a modern probate. It allows personal representatives with “Full Authority” to sell real estate and pay bills without constant court approval. Without IAEA authority, every major action requires a separate court petition and order. -
Statutory Executor Fees: California Probate Code § 10800 (Compensation)
Executor fees in California are not arbitrary. They are calculated on the gross value of the probate estate: 4% of the first $100k, 3% of the next $100k, 2% of the next $800k, and 1% of the next $9 million. This often surprises heirs when the estate has high asset value but high debt (low equity). -
Creditor Claim Deadlines: California Probate Code § 9100 (Statute of Limitations)
The primary benefit of formal probate is the “clean break” from debts. Creditors generally have four months from the issuance of Letters to file a formal claim. If they miss this deadline, the debt is usually legally unenforceable against the estate or the heirs. -
Probate Value Threshold ($208,850): California Probate Code § 13100 (Small Estate Limit)
Effective April 1, 2025, estates valued under $208,850 may qualify for summary procedures (like a Small Estate Affidavit) instead of formal probate. Note that this limit is adjusted for inflation every three years. -
Mandatory Publication: California Probate Code § 8120 (Notice to Creditors)
Before the court can appoint an executor, a Notice of Petition to Administer Estate must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city where the decedent resided. This publication serves as constructive notice to unknown creditors and potential heirs. -
The Probate Referee: California Probate Code § 8900 (Appraisal)
You cannot simply guess the value of the estate’s assets. The court appoints a neutral Probate Referee to appraise all non-cash assets (real estate, stocks, business interests). Their appraisal is required before the estate can be distributed or closed.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Moreno Valley Probate Law23328 Olive Wood Plaza Dr suite h Moreno Valley, CA 92553 (951) 363-4949
Moreno Valley Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |