|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily just received a notice from her brother, Mac, the executor of their mother’s estate. Mac is proposing to sell the family home – the only asset of any real value – to his friend for significantly less than market value. Emily is convinced Mac is intentionally devaluing the estate to benefit himself, and she fears she and her other siblings will receive almost nothing. But Emily doesn’t understand how to stop it. She’s heard something about a “11700 petition” but isn’t sure what it is or if it applies to her situation.
As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Moreno Valley, I deal with situations like Emily’s frequently. The Probate Code 11700 Petition is one of the most powerful tools beneficiaries have to protect their inheritance when an executor isn’t acting in their best interests. It’s a procedural mechanism, essentially a lawsuit filed within the probate court, that allows you to challenge the executor’s actions before they become irreversible.
Let’s break down the key elements and how it works.
What Exactly Does a Probate Code 11700 Petition Allow You to Do?
A Probate Code § 11700 Petition is a formal request to the court to oversee the actions of an executor. It doesn’t automatically remove the executor (that requires a separate process under Probate Code § 8502), but it compels them to obtain court approval before taking specific actions. This is critical because it introduces transparency and accountability. In Emily’s case, she could file a 11700 petition to require Mac to get the court’s approval before selling the house. The court can then evaluate whether the sale price is reasonable and in the best interest of all beneficiaries.
What Types of Actions Can Be Challenged with a 11700 Petition?
Essentially, any significant action by the executor that could deplete the estate’s assets or unfairly disadvantage beneficiaries is subject to challenge. Here are some common examples:
- Sales of property: As with Emily’s situation, if the executor is selling assets for less than fair market value, or to a related party, a 11700 petition can be filed.
- Payments to creditors: If the executor is disputing a creditor’s claim or paying debts in an unusual order, this can be challenged.
- Distribution of assets: If the executor is proposing to distribute assets in a way that deviates from the terms of the will, or is treating beneficiaries unequally, this is a valid reason for a petition.
- Executor’s fees: While executors are entitled to reasonable compensation (Probate Code § 8250), excessive or unjustified fees can be challenged.
- Changes to the estate plan: While less common, actions that attempt to modify the will after death can also be challenged.
What is the Process for Filing a 11700 Petition?
The process involves several key steps. First, you’ll need to draft a formal petition outlining the specific actions you are challenging and the legal basis for your objection. This is where having an attorney is crucial – probate law is complex, and a poorly drafted petition can be dismissed. Once filed, the executor will be served with a copy of the petition and will have an opportunity to respond. The court will then schedule a hearing where both sides can present their arguments.
It’s important to understand that filing a 11700 petition is not a guaranteed victory. The court will evaluate the evidence and determine whether the executor’s actions are reasonable and in compliance with the law. However, it’s a powerful tool for protecting your inheritance and ensuring the executor is held accountable.
Why a CPA Advantage Matters in 11700 Litigation
As a CPA as well as an attorney, I bring a unique perspective to these cases. Often, disputes center around the valuation of assets, the tax implications of proposed sales, or the determination of reasonable executor’s fees. My expertise in these areas allows me to provide a more thorough and persuasive case to the court. For instance, in Emily’s situation, I can independently appraise the value of the house to demonstrate that Mac’s proposed sale price is significantly below market value, and I can calculate the potential capital gains taxes that would be triggered by the sale to illustrate the financial harm to the estate. This step-up in basis analysis is often the key to winning these cases.
The Importance of Acting Quickly
If you suspect an executor is acting improperly, don’t delay. The longer you wait, the more difficult it may become to challenge their actions. Contact an experienced estate planning attorney as soon as possible to discuss your options and determine if a Probate Code 11700 petition is the right course of action.
What causes California probate cases to spiral into delay, disputes, and extra cost?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
- Court Battles: Prepare for probate litigation if agreement fails.
- Document Challenges: Understand the grounds for contesting a will.
- Trust Issues: Navigate complex probate and trust disputes.
A stable probate administration outcome usually follows from clarity, consistency, and readiness for court review, especially when multiple stakeholders and competing interpretations are involved. When documentation supports enforcement and timelines are respected, families are less likely to face preventable escalation.
Verified Authority on California Probate Litigation
-
Double Damages (Bad Faith Taking): California Probate Code § 859
The “nuclear option” of probate litigation. If the court finds that a person has in bad faith wrongfully taken, concealed, or disposed of property belonging to the estate, the judge may assess liability for twice the value of the property, in addition to recovering the asset itself. -
Grounds for Removal of Executor: California Probate Code § 8502
This statute lists the specific legal reasons a judge can fire a Personal Representative. Common grounds include wasting or mismanaging assets, neglecting the estate (moving too slow), or having an incurable conflict of interest with the beneficiaries. -
The “850 Petition” (Title Disputes): California Probate Code § 850
Probate litigation often revolves around ownership. This powerful petition allows the probate court to solve title disputes without filing a separate civil lawsuit. It is used when an asset is titled to a third party but belongs to the estate (or vice versa). -
Presumption of Undue Influence (Caregivers): California Probate Code § 21380
To prevent elder abuse, California law makes it incredibly difficult for paid caregivers to inherit from their patients. The law presumes the gift was the result of undue influence, forcing the caregiver to prove their innocence in court, often requiring a “Certificate of Independent Review.” -
Civil Discovery Rules Apply: California Probate Code § 1000
Probate is not just administrative; it is a court of law. This code section confirms that the standard rules of civil practice apply. This means litigators can use interrogatories, depositions, and demands for production of documents to build their case against a rogue executor. -
Extraordinary Fees (Litigation Costs): California Probate Code § 10811
Litigation is not covered by the standard statutory fee. Attorneys can petition the court for “extraordinary fees” for litigation services (e.g., defending a will contest or recovering stolen property). These fees are billed hourly and must be approved by the judge.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Moreno Valley Probate Law23328 Olive Wood Plaza Dr suite h Moreno Valley, CA 92553 (951) 363-4949
Moreno Valley Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |